1. sensibilium
  2. » writings
  3. » Heads
  4. » Head 2.1: The Scientist

Heads

Your guide to a multitude of heads. A source of (un)truth.

« Head 1: The Programmer | Head 2.2: The Shaman »

Head 2.1: The Scientist

Monday, the 12th of April, 1999 at 11:00am
Zeno · Comments
Scientific method forms the basis of this head. The method can be explained quite easily. First observe as closely as possible the phenomena you wish to investigate, recording all details that you feel to be significant. Then come up with a theory that fits with what you already know to explain it. Then test the theory. The experiment can be seen as the basis of science. Basically you observe two events that are identical apart from one variable. For instance to show that all objects fall to the ground at the same rate of acceleration irrespective of weight you drop two objects that have different weights (the variable) but otherwise seem identical in all features. You then measure the rates of acceleration. Only two restrictions apply to this method. Firstly experiments must be repeatable by others, this maintains the integrity of science. Secondly all explanations must be in terms of causal mechanical occurrences, in other words explanations must deal with purely physical events, concepts such as "will" or "desire" have no place in science as they are not observable (except to the person who desires) or capable of being integrated into the mechanistic description of the universe.

Science has one huge advantage it: it works. It seems to describe most of the universe pretty well, as should be expected of anything based so strongly on observation.

It does however have one major problem. Consciousness. By this I mean your subjective experience of what it's like to be you.
Science at the moment cannot explain how consciousness arises, and for the last century has basically attempted to avoid the entire issue. The early behaviourists claimed that THERE'S NO SUCH THING but this point of view soon collapsed into it's own absurdity. Modern cognitive science attempts to reduce it to intelligence, which has nothing necessarily to do with consciousness in the sense I mean. An intelligent being with no personal point of view can be imagined.

Neuroscience probably will eventually explain how mechanical interactions in our brains give birth to consciousness but what science can never do is explain what it's like to be conscious. This leads science into a tricky situation as science depends on consciousness, who takes all these measurements if not conscious beings? As a consolation to the scientists I must point out that no other analytical technique can explain the feeling of consciousness. Shamanism can illustrate it but not show how it happens and science can (perhaps) explain how it happens but not illustrate it.

Further Reading

[ul]
  • Daniel Dennet: Content and Consciousness
  • J. R. Searle: The Rediscovery of Mind
    • [li]Hume: A Treatise on Human Nature[/li][/ul]
    • This post was last edited on the 9th of August, 2009 at 4:53pm
    1. UNSCROLL

    « Head 1: The Programmer | Head 2.2: The Shaman »

    There are no comments for this article yet.

    Register or login.

    Add Your Comment
    Comment anonymously, provide a username, register or login.
    Username

    Notes:
    Please keep comments relevant.
    HTML / BBCode is disabled in comments, plain text only.
    Line breaks will be converted automatically.
    Web addresses / URL's will be auto-linked.
    Any content deemed inappropriate or offensive may be edited and/or deleted.

    1. UNSCROLL
    Opinion, Tattle & Shite
    1. Login
    Sensibilium.com is a not-for-profit communal website. Register for an account now.
    Contents
    1. Cover / Introduction
    2. Heads Introduction
    3. Head 0: The No Head
    4. Head 1: The Programmer
    5. Head 2.1: The Scientist
    6. Head 2.2: The Shaman
    7. EasyPrint
    Legal

    All the writings held within this section are the sole ownership of the author, if you really have to steal any of it, it would be nice if you gave the author due credit and a link back to this site.

    Latest Comments RSS

    ahdkaw: Not sure if anyone noticed (other than the spammer) that we had removed the reCaptcha code from the...
    ahdkaw: another couple of bugs have been found, one bug only affect the display of certain posting...
    ak: oh wow, it actually works! forget get_iplayer, the conversion to avi is messy anyway...
    ahdkaw: Reluctantly, I will try Chrome...
    ak: done & done (v11.0.52)...
    ahdkaw: The commenting system is kinda messed up at the moment, I'm trying to enable usernames for...
    ak: typical angus, commenting during comment page development. :D...
    AngusThermopile: The work around is to use chrome, perhaps some other browsers too. I dunno why chrome seems to...
    ahdkaw: For anyone who turns up here looking for an uninstallation solution, then here it is...
    ahdkaw: NAGUS! You were right! There are controls issues with BBC iPlayer in 64bit FF. Luckily I have XP in...
    ahdkaw: ^ That was me...
    Anonymous: here's a small pic I found...
    ahdkaw: I fixed the Eclipse issue, I had to install the PDE (Plug-in Development Environment) first...
    ahdkaw: I have finally made the plunge, and everything is going reasonably well so far. The only big...
    AngusThermopile: Hmm I dunno but i do have issues. Mainly with controls not working on certain flash things. Like i...
    ahdkaw: Solution, see second post - Instead of "rpm" try "yum install gnome-s...
    ahdkaw: Well, I say I am editing, but I'm not, as I have just come a cropper with CentOS, which always...
    ahdkaw: I had heard that, but I went to Youtube and that worked as expected, even with AdBlock Plus...
    AngusThermopile: I'm using it on my desktop at home without issue. Not that I'm doing anything fancy or don't have a...
    ahdkaw: That's a good question about the C-32 bill, it hasn't been passed... yet...
    Horab Fibslager: i actually haven't heard much about that bill for a while now. either they're going to try and...
    ahdkaw: Yeah, it's a shame they haven't taken the bull by the horns yet, after all zeropaid.com is Canadian...
    Horab Fibslager: i've poked around the canadian pirate party website, but the activity is lacking. the longest...
    ahdkaw: server-side scripting 4 teh win!...
    ahdkaw: Well... that's Javascript, a client-side scripting language with more security holes than a swiss...
    lhacker: The image that I posted was an older image, it is now 83, so atleast they have improved it. But...
    ahdkaw: Lol, just noticed the 55/100 for the Acid3 test, and they proudly display that lame score...
    ahdkaw: Ewwww! Internet Explorer? Let me just shake off my disgust. :p I haven't had chance to have a...
    Anonymous: Ah, thank you, for my first comments upon my first post you have done me proud! Be prepared to see...
    ahdkaw: PS: Excellent first post, you done me proud!...

    v11.0.52, 20 August 2010


    Powered by OTS.
    Wasting time since '99.